When you read
this page, you may be tempted to think I am trying to uncover who caused
the 9/11 attacks, or to say that I am denying that the Muslim terrorists
did it. Neither is true, the purpose of this page is to show that we do
not have ample evidence to have gone to war in Afghanistan. Maybe the terrorists
were Muslims, maybe they were not, I will discuss this later.
Disclaimer: I am linking to many
webpages and sites that I do not agree with when they make their conclusions.
However, many of these sites have the resources and facts that major media
outlets hide. Many of these sources however, have found their info from
major news outlets and have linked to them. I am not supporting any of
the theories or conspiracies, including our governments accusations, of
whom attacked us on 9/11. We need more investigations.
You see, the Bible tells us we must judge
righteously.
John 7:24 Judge not according
to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
Mt:7:2: For with what judgment ye judge,
ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured
to you again.
Scripture as well as American law asks
us to make good judgments, and not make judgments when reasonable doubt
exists. War is an act of judgment.
Rom 13: 1: Let every soul be subject unto the
higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are
ordained of God. 2: Whosoever therefore resisteth the
power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive
to themselves damnation. 3: For rulers are not a terror to good
works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that
which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4: For he is the minister of God to
thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth
not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute
wrath upon him that doeth evil.
Now after 9/11 we attacked Afghanistan
because we were told that the same terrorist organization that did the
9/11 attacks had camps in Afghanistan and that their government supported
this organization. But was this judgment sure? Were reasonable doubts eliminated?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hoax.html
FBI Chief Robert
Mueller admitted on September 20 and on September 27 that at this time
the FBI has no legal proof to prove the true identities of the suicidal
hijackers.
Part of this problem
is who they supposedly identified as the terrorists. But 7 of these suspects
are still alive! And no, they didn't take part and jump out with parachutes!
They were not involved at all.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
Waleed M. Alshehri
Saudi Arabian pilot
Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately
crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He acknowledges that
he attended flight training school at Dayton Beach in the United States,
and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became
a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training
course in Morocco. [BBC]
--
Wail M. Alshehri
A man by the same
name is a pilot whose father is a Saudi diplomat in Bombay. "I personally
talked to both father and son today," [said Gaafar Allagany, head of the
Saudi Embassy's information center.] [LA Times]
--
Abdulaziz Alomari
Abdulaziz Alomari
is an example of FBI improvisation. The original pilot for Flight 11 was
named as Abdul Rahman Al-Omari, he had lived next door to the nearly framed
Adnan Bukhari and they were friends. The problem for the FBI was Al-Omari
turned out to be as alive as his friend Bukhari. Undeterred, the FBI found
a new Al-Omari to replace the alive "hijacker". There's just one problem
with his replacement - he too is alive...
Original named hijacker
Abdul Rahman Al-Omari,
a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines:
Abdul Rahman Alomari
fell victim to a remarkable set of circumstances. Apart from the similarity
in names, the interest of investigators was clearly aroused by the fact
that he had studied at a Florida flight school, as had several of the suspected
hijackers.
Some 60 F.B.I agents
and local law enforcement officers ... searched [Alomari's] house for hours,
as well as a neighboring house that had been rented by Adnan Bukhari, another
pilot trainee from Saudi Arabia and a friend of Mr. Alomari's. [New York
Times]
U.S. officials in
Riyadh offered Abdul Rahman Said al-Omari an official apology in the presence
of Saudi interior ministry officials for including his name among the list
of suspects in the U.S. terrorist attacks, news agencies reported Monday.
Omari, a pilot with
Saudi Airlines, told the Saudi daily Al-Watan that he was amazed to see
his name on the FBI's list of suspects allegedly involved in the attacks
on the Pentagon and World Trade Center Tuesday, Agence France-Presse (AFP)
reported.
Omari said he returned
to Saudi Arabia in early September after undergoing training for one year
in the United States, AFP added. [IslamOnline]
Second named hijacker
Abdulaziz Al-Omari
has the same name and birth date as the named FBI "terrorist", but he has
no idea how to fly:
"I couldn't believe
it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of
birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no
idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this."
Mr Al-Omari said
his passport was stolen when his apartment in Denver, Colorado, was burgled
in 1995. He had been studying engineering at Denver University since 1993.
He was given a new passport in Riyadh on December 31, 1995 and returned
to America to resume his studies in January 1996. [Telegraph]
--
Mohand Alshehri
Saudi Embassy has
named Alshehri as a victim of mistaken identity [CNN]
According to The
Orlando Sentinel, the Saudi Arabian embassy confirmed that four of the
five mentioned by Al-Faisal - Saeed Alghamdi, Mohand Alshehri, Abdulaziz
Alomari and Salem Alhazmi - are not dead and had nothing to do with the
heinous terror attacks in New York and Washington. [American Free Press]
--
Khalid Almihdhar
ALIVE?
May be an assumed
name; there are reports he is still alive [CNN]
"I want to think
all this is a mistake," said a bewildered Khalid al-Mihammadi, 24, a computer
programmer from Mecca who was named wrongfully in an early list of hijackers
released by the U.S. Justice Department. "We are America's friends, and
they do this to us. It isn't fair."
Al-Mihammadi, who
spent nine months studying English in the U.S., said he was watching television
at home when shaken friends saw his photograph on the news and began to
call to see if he was still alive. [Chicago Tribune]
--
Salem Alhazmi
The real Salem Al-Hazmi,
however, is alive and indignant in Saudi Arabia, and not one of the people
who perished in the American Airlines flight that crashed on the Pentagon.
He works at a government-owned petroleum and chemical plant in the city
of Yanbu.
He said yesterday
he had not left Saudi Arabia for two years, but that his passport had been
stolen by a pickpocket in Cairo three years ago. [Guardian]
--
Saeed Alghamdi
He first knew that
he was on the FBI's list when he was told by a colleague. Speaking from
Tunisia, he said: "I was completely shocked. For the past 10 months I have
been based in Tunis with 22 other pilots learning to fly an Airbus 320.
The FBI provided no evidence of my presumed involvement in the attacks.
"You cannot imagine
what it is like to be described as a terrorist - and a dead man - when
you are innocent and alive." [Telegraph]
--
Ahmed Alnami
Mr Al-Nami, 33, from
Riyadh, an administrative supervisor with Saudi Arabian Airlines, said
that he was in Riyadh when the terrorists struck.
He said: "I'm still
alive, as you can see. I was shocked to see my name mentioned by the American
Justice Department. I had never even heard of Pennsylvania where the plane
I was supposed to have hijacked."
He had never lost
his passport and found it "very worrying" that his identity appeared to
have been "stolen" and published by the FBI without any checks. The FBI
had said his "possible residence" was Delray Beach in Florida. [Telegraph]
Ok that's 7 of the 19 supposed hi-jackers
who are still alive. Now for some of the supposed dead ones:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/atta_9-11.html
Mohamed Atta
Al Qaeda's lead 9/11
hijacker, Mohamed Atta, was allegedly partying with CIA-connected pilots
while he got his flight training in fall/winter 2000 at Huffman Aviation
in Venice, Fla., where two of the other 9/11 hijacker pilots trained. Atta
wasn't acting much like a holy martyr: He wore jeans and sneakers, played
video games, bought himself a red Pontiac and was said to be a hedonist.
The Press posed the question to Ben-Veniste: If Atta belonged to the fundamentalist
Muslim group, why was he snorting cocaine and frequenting strip bars?
"You know," said
Ben-Veniste, as he smiled a little. "That's a heck of a question." [9/11
CitizenWatch]
A “Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia Student Identity Card” was found in the rubble at the Pentagon with
Moqed’s name on it. Forensic examination indicated that it may have been
fraudulent.
[9/11
Commission]
--
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hanjour.html
Hani Hanjour
[Flight Academy]
Staff members characterized Mr. Hanjour as polite, meek and very quiet.
But most of all, the former employee said, they considered him a very bad
pilot. "I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the
Pentagon," the former employee said. "He could not fly at all." [New York
Times]
Hanjour, the only
suspect on Flight 77 the FBI listed as a pilot, had come to the airport
one month earlier seeking to rent a small plane.
However, when Baxter
and fellow instructor Ben Conner took the slender, soft-spoken Hanjour
on three test runs during the second week of August, they found he had
trouble controlling and landing the single-engine Cessna 172. Even though
Hanjour showed a federal pilot's license and a log book cataloging 600
hours of flying experience, chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard declined
to rent him a plane without more lessons...
...When Hanjour reapplied
to the center last year, "We declined to provide training to him because
we didn't think he was a good enough student when he was there in 1996
and 1997" Chilton said. [Newsday]
At a speed of about
500 miles an hour, the plane was headed straight for what is known as P-56,
protected air space 56, which covers the White House and the Capitol.
"The speed, the maneuverability,
the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced
air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane," says O'Brien.
"You don't fly a 757 in that manner. It's unsafe." [NATCA]
But just as the plane
seemed to be on a suicide mission into the White House, the unidentified
pilot [Hanjour] executed a pivot so tight that it reminded observers of
a fighter jet maneuver. The plane circled 270 degrees to the right to approach
the Pentagon from the west, whereupon Flight 77 fell below radar level,
vanishing from controllers' screens, the sources said.
Aviation sources
said the plane was flown with extraordinary skill, making it highly likely
that a trained pilot was at the helm, possibly one of the hijackers. Someone
even knew how to turn off the transponder, a move that is considerably
less than obvious. [Washington
Post]
"For a guy to just
jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible – there is not
one chance in a thousand," said [ex-commercial pilot Russ] Wittenberg,
recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727’s to the highly sophisticated
computerized characteristics of the 737’s through 767’s it took him considerable
time to feel comfortable flying. [LewisNews]
On Sepember 16 it
was reported that Hanjour's name was not on the passenger manifest of Flight
77 because he may not have had a ticket. [Washington
Post]
How was Hanjour able
to board the plane if he didn't have his name on the manifest or a ticket?
If Hanjour's name
wasn't on the manifest and he didn't have a ticket there can be no record
whatsoever of Hanjour boarding Flight 77, so how did the FBI know he was
on the plane?
Hani Hanjour... was
ticketed Aug. 1 for driving 55 mph in a 30 mph zone in the 1800 block of
South George Mason Drive, Arlington, Va., police said. Three weeks
after the stop, Hanjour mailed in a money order to pay a $70 fine and $30
in court costs, Arlington General District Court Clerk Kimberly Reazey
said Tuesday. [Washington
Post]
Why did Hanjour pay
a speeding fine three weeks before his planned suicide mission?
http://www.flight77.info/
"But just as the
plane seemed to be on a suicide mission into the White House, the unidentified
pilot executed a pivot so tight that it reminded observers of a fighter
jet maneuver." [washington
post]
"Aviation sources
said the plane was flown with extraordinary skill, making it highly likely
that a trained pilot was at the helm, possibly one of the hijackers." [washington
post]
"... The hijacker-pilots
were then forced to execute a difficult high-speed descending turn. Radar
shows Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle
and dropping the last 7,000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes. The steep turn
was so smooth, the sources say, it's clear there was no fight for control
going on. And the complex maneuver suggests the hijackers had better flying
skills than many investigators first believed." [CBS
news]
"...after instructors
at Pan Am International Flight Academy in Phoenix found Hanjour's piloting
skills so shoddy and his grasp of English so inadequate they questioned
whether his pilot's license was genuine." [new york times]
The BBC reported
a transcript of a phone call made by Flight Attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney
to Boston air traffic controls in which she gave the seat numbers occupied
by the hijackers, and these seat numbers did not correspond with those
of the men claimed by the FBI to be responsible for the hijacking:
The FBI has named
five hijackers on board Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only four.
Also, the seat numbers she gave were different from those registered in
the hijackers' names. [BBC
News]
I am an ex Naval
line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New Orleans,
a
Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal that we
rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various
ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th happened. Astute
observers noticed right away that there were no Arabic sounding names on
any of the flight manifests of the planes that “crashed” on that day...
...this giant and
very clumsy 400,000# Airliner, is being flown with the sort of dexterity
more normally associated with nimble combat aircraft. and at a very similar
speed.
As any airline pilot will confirm independently, the 'reverse feel' on
a Boeing 767 travelling at 575 mph is so high that the controls feel like
lead, and simply cannot be moved as quickly as you see in the film
without overwhelming hydraulic assistance, which can be provided only by
the automatic flight director. The pilots themselves cannot disengage the
'reverse feel' placed on the controls, because it is an integrated feature
designed to stop the pilots accidentally injuring passengers by imposing
extreme "G" forces at high speeds.
In turn this reveals the obvious: If qualified airline captains are incapable
of flying a Boeing 767 in this manner, then it is completely out of the
question for a bunch of "Arab Terrorist Hijackers", who failed their basic
Cessna training courses in Florida.
--
And how did WTC building
#7 fall in the manner it did when it wasn't hit by a plane? It was 300
feet away from the north tower, no jet fuel...even tho every single building
surrounding building 7 stayed in tact, it fell straight down, in 6 seconds.
Official explanation is falling debris from the twin towers caused fires,
which ignited several fuel tanks inside the building. In July 28th, 1945
a military bomber lost in the fog crashed into the Empire State building,
the building stands intact. May 4th, 1988 a 62 floor skyscraper in LA burned
for 3 hours and spread over 4 floors and did not collapse. In Feb 23, 1991
a 38 floor skyscraper burned for 19 hours in Philadelphia and spread over
8 floors, it did not collapse. Oct 17, 2004, 56th level skyscraper
in Venezuela burned for over 17 hours over 26 floors, it did not collapse.
Feb 12th 2005, 32 story tower, burned for 24 hours, the top 10 floors fell,
but the building did not collapse.
Kevin Ryan, Underwritters
Laboratories - "We know that the steel components
were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard
require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several
hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications.
Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will
not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr.
Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those
buildings makes no sense at all. This story just does not add up. If steel
from those buildings did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that
this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the
briefly burning fires in those towers."
The official explanation
of the free fall is that a top floor fell down, and when it hit the next
floor, that one broke and it fell and hit the next floor, so on and so
forth. However, this means that 47 floors fell in less than 6 seconds,
meaning each floor fell in less than 1 second, with no time to resist the
breaking before crumbling to the next. In essence its like every floor
fell without touching anything, with no resistance. How can steel and cement
collapse on each floor without slowing down even a little?
Why was there so
much pulverized concrete clouds? Why was the site over 1300 degrees after
5 days and after being watered by firemen? And why was steel melted in
the basement?
The likelihood of
terrorists in the plane doing this is small, and needs further investigation.
That is what FEMA and the 9/11 Commission Report suggests, but instead
president Bush ordered the investigation to be decreased and decided to
go to war.
President Bush personally
asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional
investigation into the events of September 11, congressional and White
House sources told CNN.
the White House brushed
off a request made by the 9-11 Commission Chairman Tom Kean, the Republican
former governor of New Jersey, to boost his budget by $11 million. Kean
had sought the funding as part of the $75 billion supplemental spending
bill that the president had just requested to pay for the war with Iraq.
Bush's refusal to increase the commission's budget frustrated and angered
a number of the members on the 9-11 panel...
...the 9-11 Commission
expressed concern that the congressionally mandated panel is at risk of
missing its final report deadline of May 2004 unless the Bush administration
acts swiftly to expand its level of cooperation...
...The Commission
complained that the Bush administration had failed to turn over key documents
and information it needed to complete a report on its findings. But June
and July were not the first time their investigation had been thwarted
by the Bush government. The commission cited other, similar roadblocks
to their investigation which must meet a 2004 deadline...
...Relatives of those
killed in the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon expressed
outrage at Bush hindering the investigation.
''I am going to assume
the White House is stonewalling the investigation,'' said Stephen Push,
director of Families of September 11...
George Bush is blocking
a full public inquiry into 9-11. Richard Cheney threatens Democrats to
keep quiet. "Press the issue, Cheney implied, and you risk being accused
of interfering with the [war on terrorism]." The Battle Back Home, Newsweek
Magazine: 02/04/02. Note: article also available from Newsweek archives.
Senate Leader Tom
Daschle said "I can tell you on January 24th, first, and on January 28th
second, and on other dates following, that request [by Cheney and Bush
not to conduct any Sept. 11 inquiry] was made." Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged
No Sept. 11 Inquiry, Reuters News Service: 5/26/02.
http://www.rense.com/general18/firefighter.htm
A signed editorial
in the January issue of Fire Engineering magazine says the current investigation
is "a half-baked farce."
CNN
- Saturday, September 13, 2003
Tape of alleged
9/11 hijacker broadcast
Al Qaeda has released
its second videotape this week -- this one apparently shows one of the
19 men who hijacked three planes for the September 11 terror attacks.
The tape, which
initially aired on the Arabic-language news network Al Jazeera television,
shows a man identified as Saeed Alghamdi.
"America is the enemy
that every Muslim should fight," the man said in the video. Alghamdi was
one of the hijackers of United Airlines Flight 93 that crashed in a Pennsylvania
field after passengers overpowered them in order to avoid hitting a fourth
target.
There's just one
problem with the above story:
ALGHAMDI IS ALIVE!
See more info about
Saeed Alghamdi above, in my list of living suspects.
The Osama Confession
tape:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
A German TV show
found that the White House's translation of the video was inaccurate
and "manipulative". Bin Laden even praised two live 'hijackers' - Wail
M. Alshehri and Salem Alhazmi. Why didn't he know the names of hijackers
he personally chose?
The quality of the
video was very poor and the authenticity of the tape was questioned. This
annoyed President Bush:
"It is preposterous
for anybody to think that this tape is doctored," he said during a brief
photo opportunity with the prime minister of Thailand. "That's just a feeble
excuse to provide weak support for an incredibly evil man." [CNN]
To be perfectly honest
it is preposterous to suggest this videotape could be authentic, but lets
have a look at it anyway. Here's 5 Osamas - which is the odd one out?
Even Mr Magoo would
have to say that Osama 'E' stands out like a sore thumb, and this is the
man confessing on the "lucky find" tape. Between the nose and the cheeks
it is clear that this man is NOT Osama.
In the video Osama
'E' appears to write notes with his right hand, yet the FBI's description
of Osama indicates he is left-handed. Osama 'E' wears a ring on his right
hand which does not appear on other confirmed photos of Osama (e.g. Osama
'B'). Another man is seen wearing a large gold ring in the video. Since
the wearing of gold rings is forbidden by Islam it shows neither he nor
Osama 'E' has any devotion to this faith.
On December 27, 2001,
a second video containing the pale skinned and very real Osama 'C' was
broadcast on al Jazeera.
The "Gaunt Tape,"
so named because bin Laden is haggard and doesn't move his left arm, is
believed to have been recorded around Nov. 19, 2001. In the tape, bin Laden
refers to the U.S. bombing of a mosque in Khost "several days" earlier.
The U.S. bombed a mosque in Khost on Nov. 16. ... [MSNBC]
So, this tape was
made around ten days after the "lucky find" tape was reportedly made. Are
we to believe that Osama's skin, hair and beard changed color in ten days?
There are other problems with the tape
discussed on that site. But here is what Osama actually said on a different
occasion:
Islamic militant
leader Osama bin Laden, the man the United States considers the prime suspect
in last week's terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, denied any
role Sunday in the actions believed to have killed thousands.
In a statement issued
to the Arabic satellite channel Al Jazeera, based in Qatar, bin Laden said,
"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every
occasion its enemies attack it.
"I would like to
assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to
have been planned by people for personal reasons," bin Laden's statement
said.
"I have been living
in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules.
The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations," bin
Laden said.
Asked Sunday if he
believed bin Laden's denial, President Bush said, "No question he is the
prime suspect. No question about that."
Since Tuesday's terrorist
attacks against the United States, Bush has repeatedly threatened to strike
out against terrorism and any nation that supports or harbors its disciples.
Now I am not going to speculate
how 9/11 occurred. God will reveal it to us when the time is right. Perhaps
the Muslim terrorists did it, but there is too much problematic evidences
saying otherwise. Perhaps after further investigation we could go to war.
But President Bush decided to judge Afghanistan rashly without righteous
judgment.
We cannot just attack a country because
they're bad, and desire to hurt us. We can't attack because we think they
attacked us, we must attack only when we know they attacked us. Now you
could say past is past, get on with it. The fact is many christians encouraged
this attack, including myself, because I believed the Muslims did attack
us, now I don't know that. I don't know what happened, and neither
does the government by what they have told us officially.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
When asked why there
is no mention of 9/11 on Bin
Laden’s Most Wanted web page, [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity
for the FBI] said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s
Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin
Laden to 9/11.” ... The Muckraker Report attempted to secure a reference
to the U.S. government authenticating the Bin Laden “confession video”,
to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and
U.S. Congress, along with the dead stream media, played the video as if
it was authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as
hard evidence? [Muckraker
Report]
Would you support a school, where the principal
punished children when there was not reasonable evidence beyond reasonable
doubt? No. You would call such a principle an abuser.
I know there are and were terrorist training
camps in those countries, I know they wanted to hurt Americans, but I do
not know they had or have the capacity to do it. Should we kill them, just
because they want to kill us? No. It's not right.
We cannot punish people when there is reasonable
evidence that says someone was not involved. That is unrighteous judgment,
and scripture says if we judge unrighteous we will be judged in the same
manner.
Recently on a conservative radio show they
interviewed some westernized Arab academic, who said he believed in the
western ways. He had a plan, and I agree with it. He says put aside these
religious kooks in turbans for a minute, and instead attack the powers
they hide behind and the powers which give them the weapons of mass destruction.
Once you do that, these fanatics will be powerless. Now, I could say that
Iraq was such a power, but not Afghanistan. I definitely see Iran as such
a power. But I would do it as Israel did, and just destroy the facilities
which they use to make these devices rather than attack the whole nation.
Now in a case where terrorists do strike
and are caught red handed as Israel lost 2 soldiers to Hezbollah, then
they have the right to invade the country they are hiding in. But we do
not have sufficient evidence that terrorists had actually done 9/11.
If the likelihood of such a task was high,
and we did everything defensively to protect ourselves, and it was still
high, then an attack for preventative measures would be justified on terrorists
training camps and terror cells. By the way, they knew where Mohammed Atta's
cell was located in New York before the attack:
My biggest concern (tho I have many) is
the unrighteous judgment. But the worse part of unrighteous judgment is
that it back fires onto the persons involved with the judging. If we as
citizens or as christians endorse such a thing, we are going to be judged
ourselves.
Take away all conspiracies, and you still
get the fact we went to war without righteous cause (Afghanistan, perhaps
not Iraq, but that's debatable because I don't see a threat of terrorists
using bio-weopons). And turning your back on that because it's in the past
will not negate God's judgment on us for it. That is the only thing I want
convince you of.
Some say we took Afghanistan to get to
Iraq or Iran, and that is equally wrong.
I believe there was fabricated evidence
at the time to make the Muslims look guilty:
Britain's Guardian
newspaper reported Sunday that American investigators probing anthrax outbreaks
in Florida and New York believe they have all the hallmarks of a terrorist
attack -- and have named Iraq as the prime suspect as the source of the
deadly spores.
The London paper
quoting CIA sources as saying that "Iraq has the technology and supplies
of anthrax suitable for terrorist use."
One CIA source told
the paper: "They aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan. This
is prima facie evidence of the involvement of a state intelligence agency.
Maybe Iran has the capability. But it doesn't look likely politically.
That leaves Iraq." [NewsMax
10-15-01]
The Anthrax letters
came from inside the United States.
The letters contained
a specific type of weaponized Anthrax made by a United States military
lab which had been claiming for a lot of years that it wasn't doing that
sort of thing any more...
The pattern of the
mailings of the Anthrax letters was also suspicious. Congress got their
Anthrax letters just in time for the vote on the disingenuously named USA
Patriot Act (aka the anti-terror bill) which the terrorized Senators
voted into law without bothering to read. The bill was signed on Oct. 26,
2001, and it opened
the door for a wide array of civil rights and liberties violations.
How convenient for the bill's sponsors that there was a terror attack on
the Congress just when Congress was about to vote on the anti-terror bill.
Eerie timing, isn't it?
So now, knowing that
the Anthrax letters came from an American source, take another look at
the actual letters.
Click letters for
full sized image
There are several
indications of deliberate deception in these items.
A terrorist group
who hates every American would not advertise the fact that the letters
contained a biological weapon, they would have enclosed an innocuous letter
to ensure maximum spread of the agent. Look at the letters, they are virtually
shouting "seal off the area and see a doctor now!"
...Dates written
by Middle Easterners begin with the day first, then the month, then the
year - the date should have read 11-9-01. The above letters follow the
American convention for dates.
One of the letters
is a photocopy of another. Most places which have copiers have typewriters
or word processors, appliances whose operation is no mystery to the sort
of people who go in and out of government laboratories.
In short, the entire
look of the letters is a contrived fake, creating what they thought a letter
from Arabs would look like, so that the phrases "Death to Israel", and
"Allah is Great" (a real Muslim says either "Allah Achbar" or "God is Great")
would point the finger of blame for the Anthrax at Arabs.
Except that we know
for a fact that the Anthrax didn't come from the Middle East. It isn't
Saddam's or Osama's, it's the very best high quality mil-spec Anthrax home
grown at Fort Detrick, Dugway, and USAMRIID.
It's our Anthrax.
And that means that
all the slanted writing, the extra crossings on the "T"s, the references
to Allah and Israel are a carefully crafted hoax, designed to trick Americans
into thinking that Arab Muslims were to blame for the Anthrax letters.
In an April 19 speech
delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that
the purported hijackers, in his words, “left no paper trial.” The FBI director
stated flatly, "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece
of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information
that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere—that mentioned any aspect
of the Sept. 11 plot."...
The stark reality
is that Arab men were named as the suspects for 9-11 on the basis of IDs
admitted by the FBI to be fake. Aside from evidence which senior intelligence
officials admit appears to have been planted, the FBI was unable to find
any evidence at all that the named suspects had anything to do with 9-11.
None of the alleged
Arab hijacker's names appear on any of the aircraft passenger lists...
So saying all this, this is why, at least
one of the reasons, why I believe judgment is coming on America, and the
church; and why I believe God has declared for us to prepare for the yoke
(see the following link for more).
